by Redwin Tursor
Executive Summary
Modern American communist and anarchist movements have transformed from accessible revolutionary ideologies into exclusive academic clubs that would be unrecognizable to their founders. Through excessive theoretical gatekeeping, these movements have adopted cult-like characteristics that prioritize ideological purity over practical action, effectively alienating the working-class base they claim to represent. This paper examines how the intentional accessibility of foundational communist and anarchist theory has been replaced by academic elitism that serves as a barrier to entry rather than a tool for liberation.
The Founders' Vision: Revolution for the Masses
Marx and Engels: Theory as Tool, Not Barrier
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels designed communist theory to be fundamentally accessible to working people. The Communist Manifesto, their most influential work, was written as propaganda—deliberately simple, direct, and emotionally compelling. Marx famously declared that "the philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it," explicitly rejecting the notion that extensive theoretical knowledge should precede revolutionary action.
Marx's economic analysis in Capital was intended for intellectuals and organizers who needed to understand capitalism's mechanics, but he never suggested workers needed to master economic theory to recognize their exploitation. The entire concept of class consciousness assumes that workers will naturally understand their situation through lived experience, not academic study.
Anarchist Anti-Intellectualism by Design
Classical anarchists like Peter Kropotkin, Mikhail Bakunin, and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon went even further in rejecting intellectual elitism. Bakunin explicitly opposed Marx's emphasis on theory, arguing that hierarchical knowledge systems were themselves tools of oppression. Kropotkin's "Mutual Aid" demonstrated that cooperative behavior was a natural human instinct requiring no theoretical justification.
The anarchist tradition emphasizes direct action and practical experimentation over theoretical understanding. Emma Goldman's famous (though possibly apocryphal) quote about dancing captures this spirit: revolutionary movements should be joyful, accessible, and immediately meaningful to ordinary people.
The Contemporary Perversion: Academic Gatekeeping as Cult Behavior
Barrier Creation in Modern American Movements
Contemporary American communist and anarchist groups have systematically created barriers that would have appalled their ideological founders:
Reading List Requirements: Many groups effectively require familiarity with dozens of theoretical texts before accepting someone as a "real" communist or anarchist. These lists often include obscure academic works that have little practical relevance to revolutionary activity.
Theoretical Purity Tests: Members face constant challenges to prove their ideological sophistication through theoretical knowledge rather than practical commitment or effective action.
Jargon Proliferation: Movements have developed specialized vocabularies that serve primarily to exclude outsiders rather than clarify concepts. Terms like "praxis," "dialectical materialism," and "mutual aid" are wielded as shibboleths.
Academic Credentialism: Leadership positions increasingly go to individuals with formal academic training rather than those with practical organizing experience or working-class backgrounds.
Cult Characteristics in Practice
These behaviors exhibit classic cult-like properties:
Exclusive Knowledge Claims: Groups present their particular interpretation of theory as the only valid understanding, dismissing alternative approaches as "revisionist" or "not real anarchism/communism."
Initiation Rituals: New members must demonstrate theoretical knowledge through informal testing, reading group participation, or public demonstrations of ideological purity.
Internal Hierarchy Based on Knowledge: Despite egalitarian rhetoric, these groups develop clear hierarchies where theoretical sophistication determines influence and respect.
Hostility to Outsiders: Groups display aggressive dismissal of anyone who hasn't completed their informal curriculum, treating ideological differences as moral failings.
Emphasis on Study Over Action: Endless reading groups, theory discussions, and internal debates take precedence over practical organizing or direct action.
The Accessibility Comparison: Why Mainstream Movements Succeed
Lower Barriers in Successful Movements
Contemporary progressive, liberal, and conservative movements maintain significantly lower entry barriers:
- Progressivism operates on accessible principles (social justice, equality, environmental protection) that don't require theoretical grounding
- Liberalism functions practically around individual rights and democratic participation without requiring study of Locke or Rawls
- Conservatism appeals to traditional values and common sense rather than demanding philosophical sophistication
These movements succeed precisely because they allow meaningful participation without extensive theoretical preparation.
The Numbers Don't Lie
The inverse relationship between theoretical requirements and movement size is stark:
- Progressive and liberal movements: Millions of active participants
- Conservative movements: Millions of active participants
- American communist groups: Thousands of participants
- American anarchist groups: Hundreds to low thousands of participants
This isn't coincidence—it's the predictable result of creating unnecessary barriers to entry.
The Practical Consequences of Cult-ification
Class Betrayal Through Academic Elitism
By requiring extensive theoretical knowledge, these movements systematically exclude the working-class people they claim to represent. A single mother working two jobs doesn't have time to read Capital. A factory worker dealing with unsafe conditions doesn't need to understand dialectical materialism to recognize exploitation.
This academic gatekeeping represents a fundamental betrayal of communist and anarchist principles, creating movements dominated by middle-class intellectuals who fetishize theory over material struggle.
Organizational Paralysis
Groups spend more time debating theoretical fine points than engaging in practical organizing. The result is organizational paralysis where perfect theory takes precedence over imperfect action.
Political Irrelevance
By making themselves inaccessible to ordinary people, these movements have rendered themselves politically irrelevant. They become academic discussion clubs rather than revolutionary forces.
Breaking the Cult Cycle: Recommendations for Recovery
Return to Foundational Accessibility
Eliminate Reading Requirements: Groups should welcome anyone committed to basic principles without requiring theoretical study.
Prioritize Action Over Theory: Practical organizing, mutual aid, and direct action should take precedence over theoretical discussion.
Use Plain Language: Abandon academic jargon in favor of clear, direct communication that anyone can understand.
Value Experience Over Education: Prioritize practical experience and working-class perspectives over academic credentials.
Structural Reforms
Abolish Informal Hierarchies: Create genuinely horizontal organizations where theoretical knowledge doesn't determine influence.
Focus on Material Conditions: Ground organizing in immediate, practical concerns rather than abstract theoretical positions.
Embrace Ideological Diversity: Accept that people can be effective communists or anarchists without agreeing on every theoretical point.
Conclusion: The Choice Between Purity and Power
American communist and anarchist movements face a fundamental choice: they can continue operating as exclusive academic clubs that prioritize theoretical purity, or they can return to their founders' vision of accessible revolutionary movements.
The current path leads only to continued irrelevance and cult-like insularity. Marx didn't write for graduate students—he wrote for workers. Kropotkin didn't design anarchism for philosophy professors—he designed it for ordinary people seeking freedom and cooperation.
If these movements want to become politically relevant rather than academic curiosities, they must abandon their gatekeeping practices and return to the radical accessibility that their founders intended. The revolution doesn't require reading lists—it requires commitment to justice and the courage to act.
The working class doesn't need to read a fucking dictionary to understand exploitation. If your movement requires one, you're not building revolution—you're building a cult.
No comments:
Post a Comment