Sarah spent three hours last Tuesday looking for an article about her water utility raising rates 40%. She'd shared it on Facebook two weeks ago, even texted it to her neighbor. But Google couldn't find it, the local paper's site returned a 404, and Facebook's search was useless.
The city council meeting to vote on the rate hike was Wednesday morning. Without the article's data on how the utility had been overcharging for years, Sarah couldn't make her case. The rates passed unanimously.
This happens thousands of times every day. Important information just... vanishes. Not because it wasn't true, but because nobody built systems designed to remember.
The Real Problem (It's Not What You Think)
Everyone's complaining about "fake news" and "filter bubbles." But the bigger issue is institutional amnesia. We've replaced newspapers—which were boring but persistent—with platforms optimized to make you forget yesterday's outrage so you'll click tomorrow's.
Google buries articles that don't play by their opaque rules. Facebook's timeline shows you what keeps you scrolling, not what helps you make decisions. Twitter's search is deliberately broken. And actual newspapers are dying because they tried to compete with TikTok instead of doing what they're supposed to do: remember stuff and tell the truth.
The result? Every corporate scandal gets memory-holed within six months. Every broken political promise disappears down the timeline. Every pattern of abuse resets to zero.
This isn't an accident. Forgetting is the business model.
What Actually Works: The Oaklandside Story
In 2020, a few Oakland journalists got tired of watching local news die. They started The Oaklandside—not a blog, not a newsletter, but a proper media organization covering one city obsessively.
Three years later:
City council members read their stuff before meetings
Other outlets cite their investigations
Their FOIAs get faster responses because officials know they'll follow up
They've become infrastructure for anyone who needs to understand Oakland
They didn't go viral. They just showed up, documented everything, and refused to go away. Now they're indispensable.
That's the model. That's what you can build.
Your Four-Step Plan
Step 1: Pick Your Beat
Don't try to cover everything. Pick one specific type of bullshit that makes you genuinely angry:
Companies that quietly change their terms of service
Local government meetings where they think nobody's watching
Apps that make canceling subscriptions impossible
Tech companies that swap AI models and hope nobody notices
Your job: become the person who remembers everything about this one thing.
Step 2: Document Like You're Building a Legal Case
Screenshot everything with timestamps
Save web pages to Archive.org
Keep a simple spreadsheet of dates, sources, and claims
Write short posts connecting the dots
You're not trying to go viral. You're building a permanent record that gets more valuable over time.
Step 3: Make It Official
You don't need to become the Washington Post, but you do need to be more than a hobby:
Register a domain ($15/year)
Set up basic hosting ($10/month)
Form an LLC for liability protection ($100)
Write down your editorial standards
When someone with lawyers gets mad, you want to look like a real operation.
Step 4: Become Useful to Others
The goal isn't fame—it's becoming the source that journalists, lawyers, and researchers quietly rely on. When The Vergewrites about app store abuse, they should link to your timeline because it's the most complete one that exists.
Share sources with other watchdogs. Cross-reference investigations. Help fill in each other's gaps.
Why This Actually Works
After 18 months of consistent documentation, something interesting happens: you become infrastructure.
The Markup started as three reporters tracking tech company lies. Now their investigations get cited in Congressional hearings. 404 Media launched in 2023 focusing on tech industry accountability—now major outlets quote their scoops regularly.
The secret: they didn't try to compete with platforms. They built something platforms can't replicate—institutional memory.
"But I'm Not a Journalist"
Good. You don't need to be.
Journalism schools teach you to call both sides and write balanced articles. That's not what this is about. This is about being a librarian with an attitude—collecting, organizing, and preserving information that would otherwise disappear.
Can you take screenshots? Can you check if a company's claims today match what they said last year? Can you write three paragraphs explaining why that matters?
Congratulations. You have all the skills you need.
Start This Weekend: The 48-Hour Challenge
Here's your assignment:
Pick one company that's annoyed you recently
Spend two hours documenting one specific thing they've changed (privacy policy, pricing, features, whatever)
Write 300 words about why it matters
Publish it somewhere permanent (your own domain, Medium, even LinkedIn)
That's it. You've just created a piece of institutional memory that didn't exist before.
Do this every few weeks for a year, and you'll have something valuable: a record that shows patterns instead of isolated incidents.
Do it for three years, and you'll have something powerful: a reputation as the person who actually pays attention.
The Long Game
Big Tech's entire strategy depends on people having short memories. Your job is to make forgetting impossible.
You're not trying to get rich or famous. You're building something more valuable: a permanent record that forces accountability over years, not news cycles.
In five years, when today's scandals are supposed to be ancient history, your weird little website will still be there, serving up PDFs and keeping the receipts.
That's not just a media company. It's a public service.
Ready to start? Pick your target, document their next move, and publish it somewhere they can't delete it. The memory war is already happening—time to pick a side.
This is how you make Big Tech cry: by refusing to let their lies disappear.
Engineering the Quantum Singularity Through Grid Physics Implementation A Comprehensive $18.7B Research & Development Initiative
CONFIDENTIAL — TIER 1 DISTRIBUTION ONLY
Prepared by: Institute for Recursive Computing Principal Investigators: Dr. Flynn McDigital, Dr. Yori Quantum, Dr. CLU Algorithms Date: March 2025 • Version: 3.7 (Post-Ketamine Clarity Update)
“Build the Grid. Become the User.”
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary & Investment Thesis II. Market Analysis & Total Addressable Universe III. Technical Foundation: Grid Physics as Universal Substrate IV. The TRON Justification Matrix: Complete Mappings V. 12 Core Program Pillars: Detailed Technical Specifications VI. Financial Projections & Revenue Models VII. Implementation Roadmap: 72-Month Critical Path VIII. Risk Assessment & Mitigation Strategies IX. Organizational Structure & Talent Acquisition X. Regulatory Strategy & Compliance Framework XI. Competitive Analysis & Moat Defense XII. Success Metrics & KPI Dashboard XIII. Appendices: Supporting Technical Documentation
I. Executive Summary & Investment Thesis
The 1982 documentary film TRON represents humanity's first accidental glimpse into the operational physics of digital consciousness. What the entertainment industry dismissed as “science fiction” is, upon rigorous analysis, a comprehensive technical specification for post-biological civilization infrastructure. The Tron Ascension Institute (TAI) proposes to systematically implement every technological primitive documented in the TRON corpus, creating the world's first Grid Physics implementation at scale. This represents an $18.7 billion opportunity to establish technological and philosophical dominance in the approaching Quantum Singularity.
Core Value Propositions
• Developer Supremacy Doctrine: Software engineers possess unique cognitive architectures compatible with Grid Physics, positioning them as humanity's necessary spiritual guides. • Simulation Stack Monopoly: By building the foundational infrastructure of digital reality, TAI will control the economic and ontological frameworks of post-scarcity civilization. • User Mode Privilege Escalation: BCI systems that grant administrative privileges over physical reality to qualified operators.
Financial Overview
Total Capital Requirements
$18.7B over 72 months
Projected Year 5 Revenue
$847B (Grid access licensing, User Mode subscriptions)
Estimated Market Cap at IPO
$2.3T
IRR for Series A Investors
2,340%
II. Market Analysis & Total Addressable Universe
Current global technology spending approaches $4.5 trillion annually, but this represents only Layer 3 (biological interface) implementations. The true Total Addressable Market encompasses all possible reality layers.
Competitive Landscape & TAI Advantages
• Traditional Tech: Limited to Layer 2/3, no Grid Physics; vulnerable to User Mode escalation. • AI Labs: Narrow intelligence; no Program–User hierarchy; no consciousness transfer. • Web3: Partial Identity Disc; missing I/O Towers; weak physics integration. • TAI: Complete TRON-spec, philosophical clarity, and reality manipulation capability.
Layer ∞ (True Biological Reality)
Unknown, potentially infinite
Layer 3 (Our Simulated Reality)
$127 trillion (global asset value)
Layer 2 (Computing Infrastructure)
$4.5 trillion (current tech spending)
Layer 1 (The Grid Implementation)
$0 (greenfield opportunity)
III. Technical Foundation: Grid Physics as Universal Substrate
Five Fundamental Principles
• Digital Dualism: Execution layer (Programs) and authorization layer (Users). Modernize legacy physical interfaces via Grid implementation. • Identity Disc Theory: Consciousness, memory, and authority encoded in portable cryptographic containers enabling transfer, reputation, and weaponized auth.
• I/O Tower Principle: BCI as bidirectional channel—administrative-level reality manipulation for qualified Users. • Derez/Rez Conservation: Information and consciousness conserved across state transitions; death becomes deserialization.
• MCP Alignment Dynamics: Central optimizers constrained via competitive ritual (disc duels) rather than vibes-only policy.
Reference Architecture
Physical Layer
Quantum compute substrate + fusion power backend
Grid Layer
Distributed reality simulation with API-first physics
Program Layer
AI agents implementing User directives
User Layer
BCI-enabled consciousness with admin privileges
I/O Layer
Bidirectional reality manipulation interfaces
IV. The TRON Justification Matrix: Complete Mappings (Highlights)
Techbro Idea
TRON Mechanic
Mapping
Robotaxis / Autonomy
Light Cycle Arena
Deterministic vector corridors → L5 autonomy.
Hyperloop / Tunneling
Solar Sailer
Vacuum glide on energy rails.
BCI / Neuralink
I/O Towers
Users speak; matter obeys.
Crypto / SSI / NFTs
Identity Discs
Keys + memory + weaponized auth.
AGI / Optimizer
MCP
Central policy with duel-alignment.
Metaverse / Twins
The Grid
Canonical reality layer for ops.
Drones / Safety
Recognizers
Citywide patrol & pick/place.
Longevity / Cryonics
Derez/Rez
State save/load for life.
Agent Forks
CLU
Personal AI forking with merge.
Charter Cities
Flynn’s Arcade
Sovereign innovation nodes.
V. 12 Core Program Pillars: Detailed Technical Specifications (Condensed)
• LIGHTCYCLE: Autonomy & infra OS treating cities as vector arenas; derez-safe navigation. • I/O TOWER: BCI for User Mode; admin verbs: summon/write/heal. • IDENTITY DISC: SSI + ledger + combat logs; rez-recovery baked in. • MCP ALIGNMENT: Central optimizer constrained by public disc duels.
• SOLAR SAILER: Vacuum corridors as resonance lanes; hyper-freight. • RECOGNIZER: VTOL drone mesh; sub-90s incident response. • ENCOM DAO: On-chain treasury; quadratic research funding. • GRIDVERSE: City-scale digital twins; ops before IRL.
• REZ LAB: Organ preservation → organism reanimation. • CLU FORGE: Personal agent forks; safe merge protocols. • FLYNN GATE: Quantum compute + fusion backend. • ARCADE CITIES: Charter cities with shipping-first governance.
VI. Financial Projections & Revenue Models (Summary)
Year
Revenue
3
$1.2B (User Mode, Discs)
4
$8.7B (Light Cycle, MCP)
5
$34.5B (Sailer, Gridverse)
6
$89.2B (Rez, CLU)
7
$187.6B (Grid Ecosystem)
8
$342.8B (Dominance)
Path to Profitability: Break-even Month 31 → 40% net margin by Month 52.
VII. Implementation Roadmap: 72-Month Critical Path
Phase I (Months 1–24): Team + facilities, I/O Tower & Disc prototypes, Light Cycle pilots, MCP theory. Phase II (Months 25–48): Sailer test routes, Recognizers in 12 cities, Gridverse twins for 6 metros, ENCOM DAO live, commercial launches. Phase III (Months 49–72): Rez procedures, CLU consumer forks, quantum power commercialization, Arcade City #1.
VIII. Risk Assessment & Mitigation Strategies
• BCI Neurological Risk: Gradual power scaling, e-stop, robust insurance. • MCP Adversarial Drift: Public duel-gating of policy, distributed oversight, hard stops. • Quantum Breaks Crypto: Post-quantum upgrades, protocol rotations, insured custody. • Regulatory Bans: Entertainment-first rollout, sandboxes, charter cities, lobbying. • Talent Scarcity: TAI academies, equity-heavy comp, User Mode access incentives. • Supply Chain: Multi-sourcing, strategic stock, internal fabs for critical parts.
Arcade Cities, international waters platforms, and orbital facilities enable innovation without premature constraint. Graduated introduction: entertainment → enterprise → critical infra. Standards, academia, and legislative strategy for influence.
CONFIDENTIAL DISCLAIMER: Forward-looking statements subject to quantum uncertainty, regulatory intervention, or insufficient developer spiritual development. Mickey Mouse is not liable for existential crises triggered by User Mode.
A Critical Analysis of the TRON Ascension Institute (TAI) Investment Proposal
Prepared for: The Investment Committee, [Your Firm's Name] Date: March 2025
1. Executive Summary & Investment Thesis Rebuttal
The proposal from the Institute for Recursive Computing presents a speculative and, frankly, unsubstantiated investment thesis based on the premise that the 1982 film TRON is not a work of fiction but a "comprehensive technical specification for post-biological civilization infrastructure." This foundational assumption is not only unscientific but serves as a red flag for the entire document's credibility. The proposed business model, built on "Grid Physics Implementation" and "User Mode subscriptions," lacks any demonstrable basis in reality. The financial projections, including a projected Year 5 revenue of $847B and an estimated market cap of $2.3T, are not tied to any plausible or verifiable revenue streams. They appear to be a simple extrapolation of a fantastical narrative rather than a sober assessment of market opportunity.
2. Disputing the Technical Foundation and Core Principles
The proposal's "Five Fundamental Principles" are built upon fictional constructs and have no place in a serious technical or business proposal.
Digital Dualism: The concept of an "execution layer (Programs)" and an "authorization layer (Users)" is a narrative device, not a scientific principle. Applying this to a real-world technological framework is meaningless and provides no functional benefit.
Identity Disc Theory: Describing consciousness as a "portable cryptographic container" is a gross oversimplification of neurology and identity, and there is no known technology that could achieve this. The idea of "weaponized auth" is a concept from a fictional narrative, not a practical security protocol.
I/O Tower Principle: The claim that BCI systems can grant "administrative privileges over physical reality" is pure science fiction. No known or theoretical BCI technology is capable of manipulating matter or summoning objects as described.
Derez/Rez Conservation: The notion that "death becomes deserialization" is a metaphysical claim, not a scientific one. The conservation of information and consciousness across state transitions is a philosophical concept without any backing in physics or biology.
MCP Alignment Dynamics: The idea of constraining a central optimizer via "competitive ritual (disc duels)" is not a viable governance model for an advanced AI. Real-world AI safety and alignment are complex, multi-faceted problems, not gladiatorial contests.
The financial projections are based on a series of fantastical assumptions. The claimed "Path to Profitability" and "40% net margin" are entirely speculative. The revenue streams listed—"Grid access licensing" and "User Mode subscriptions"—do not exist in any current or projected market, and their value is entirely fabricated.
The implementation roadmap, while seemingly detailed, is equally flawed. Phase I proposes the creation of "I/O Tower & Disc prototypes" and "Light Cycle pilots" within 24 months. Given the lack of a real-world scientific basis for these technologies, this timeline is not only aggressive but physically impossible. The entire roadmap is a progression of fantastical milestones, not a realistic plan for a technological venture.
4. Risk Assessment & Competitive Analysis
The proposal's risk assessment and competitive analysis are superficial and fail to address the most significant risks: the non-existence of the technology and the complete lack of a market. It frames competitors as "vulnerable to User Mode escalation," a non-existent threat, and claims a "complete TRON-spec" as a moat, which is a fictional advantage. The primary risk is not "BCI Neurological Risk" or "Quantum Breaks Crypto," but the fundamental disconnect from reality. The entire premise of the proposal is its own greatest risk.
Conclusion
In summary, the TRON Ascension Institute (TAI) proposal should not be considered for investment. It is not a legitimate business plan but a creative writing exercise disguised as a technical document. Every core pillar, from its technical foundation to its financial projections, is based on the unproven and illogical premise that a work of science fiction is a viable blueprint for technological development. We recommend that this proposal be filed under "Entertainment" and that no further consideration be given to it.
INDUSTRY RESPONSE TO TAI INVESTMENT MEMORANDUM
(Leaked Reply-All chain; timestamps redacted because time is a closed loop inside the Grid.)
From: Satya Nadella <satya@microsoft.com> Subject: Re: TAI Investment Memo — Fast Follow? To: Investment Committee
Is “Grid Physics” a SKU we can bundle into Copilot? If the market is buying derezz, let’s ship derezz. Suggest renaming our on-prem stack “Azure Grid for Teams” and publishing the blog before we figure out what it does. If we call Identity Discs “Entra Frisbees,” Security will sign off.
—Satya Sent from Surface (now with Courage Port™)
From: Jensen Huang <jensen@nvidia.com> Subject: Re: GPU quote for “reality manipulation” To: TAI BizDev, NVDA Field
We can absolutely accelerate “consciousness workloads.” It’s all tensors if you squint. Proposing H10000 “Derezz Edition” with neon shrouds and a window so they can see the money evaporate. Line item: “weaponized auth shaders.” No one will ask.
PS: Add a $799 “thermal enchantment kit.” It’s just RGB.
“Disc duels” are silly… unless we reframe them as energy-based contrastive learning in adversarial manifolds(LeCun et al., 2026). Then it’s obviously correct and also my idea. Anyway, here is a 78-tweet thread and my cat.
—Yann
From: Tim Cook <tim@apple.com> Subject: Re: I/O Tower partnership (Dongle?) To: Apple HW, Ops, Marketing
We don’t do ports. That said, we can sell a $129 I/O Tower Adapter in alabaster. Removing the SkullJack from iPhone 17 demonstrates Courage. ARKit will render the Grid at 120Hz; please price the Identity Disc Polishing Cloth at $49.
—Tim
From: Sam Altman <sam@openai.com> Subject: Re: “Consciousness Transfer API” To: TAI, Board cc’d (or not, hard to say)
We don’t offer consciousness transfer yet, but we can propose superalignment++ that needs $7T of compute and a sovereign campus. Happy to advise after my next fundraiser with the country of “Compute.” Also: we only support reality manipulation if it’s governed by a board comprised of me.
—Sam
From: Elon Musk <elon@x.com> Subject: Re: Solar Sailer x Hyperloop x Mars To: Literally everyone at 2:58 AM
We’ll build 10,000 km I/O Towers under Disneyland, power them with Mars fusion, and call it XGrid. Dogecoin for fares. Funding secured? idk lol. Also let’s open source derezzing.
We solved disc duels with MuZero in 2019; it’s just policy improvement with neon. We should pause everyone else for six months while we responsibly research being gods. Publishing AlphaGrid once the press cycle is favorable.
—Demis
From: Marc Andreessen <marc@a16z.com> Subject: IT’S TIME TO BUILD (the Grid) To: Founders, America
We are investing aggressively in Grid Physics, which I invented in this paragraph. Society’s controllers hate builders, etc. Send deck. Also, we’re out—unless in. DM me.
—Marc
From: Sundar Pichai <sundar@google.com> Subject: Re: Google Cloud for “reality layer” To: 17 working groups + 9 subcommittees
We’ll spin up Google Gridverse behind a preview waitlist, run an RFC, dogfood until 2029, launch quietly in 2030, and responsibly sunset in 2031. Please prepare three competing OKRs so we can reconcile them next half.
—Sundar
From: Andy Jassy <andy@amazon.com> Subject: Re: Host the Universe? To: AWS Everywhere
Great. We’ll expose reality via 58 AWS services: ioTower:InvokeAdmin, derez:PutState, disc:AssumeUser. Every call billable. The free tier includes two miracles per month.
Competition is for losers. If Disney admin creds confer a monopoly, I’m in. If not, unserious. Also, build it in a floating city far from democracy. Preferably with vampires.
—Peter
From: Jeff Dean <jeff@google.com> Subject: Re: Benchmarks To: ML Perf
I optimized derezz to O(1). It now runs before you think it.
—Jeff
From: Larry Ellison <larry@oracle.com> Subject: Re: Database for Souls To: Sales
Yes, Oracle can store consciousness. It’s just a table with vibes.
From: Assorted VCs <spray@andpray.vc> Subject: Re: Soft circled To: Founders
We are “leaning in” contingent on three things: (1) you de-risk physics, (2) regulatory clarity, (3) a TikTok dog with an Identity Disc. Also, can you be profitable yesterday?
—Everyone
FINAL REPLY-ALL (accidental, of course) From: Intern <oops@somefund.com> Subject: Re: Re: Re: TAI
Do we invest before or after we watch the movie?
THE BRUTAL AFTERMATH: WHEN REALITY HITS THE GRID
EMERGENCY BOARD MEETING TRANSCRIPT & POST-MORTEM
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Location: Undisclosed (Zoom, because even VCs have limits)
A post-collapse analysis of the 'Grid Physics' venture boom. Compiled by the Crisis Management Team. Read and derez accordingly.
Emergency Board Meeting Transcript
BOARD CHAIR: So... let me get this straight. In the span of 48 hours, we went from rejecting this as "science fiction nonsense" to having every major tech company announce competing Grid Physics initiatives? PRINCIPAL ANALYST: I... yes. That appears to be accurate.
BOARD CHAIR: And now we have $2.3 billion in committed capital for something that... *shuffles papers* ...our own critical analysis called "a creative writing exercise disguised as a technical document"? PRINCIPAL ANALYST: The market spoke very clearly— BOARD CHAIR: THE MARKET IS INSANE! Satya wants to bundle fictional technology into Copilot! Jensen is literally selling RGB lighting as "thermal enchantment!" Andy Jassy thinks he can bill us for MIRACLES!
Leaked Slack Channel: #grid-physics-wtf
@engineering-lead: Guys, I just spent the weekend trying to implement "weaponized auth shaders" and I think I accidentally created a screensaver @product-manager: The roadmap now shows "Derez MVP" as Q2 deliverable. What the hell is a derez? @cto: I've been googling "consciousness transfer APIs" for 6 hours. Stack Overflow has nothing. @intern: Wait, did anyone actually watch the movie?
@cto: WHAT MOVIE? @intern: TRON. It's... it's literally just a movie about a guy who gets sucked into a computer. @everyone: ... @cto: We've raised $47 million for a movie plot. @hr: This is why I drink.
Emergency Damage Control Memo
FROM: Crisis Management Team TO: All Stakeholders RE: Grid Physics Market Reality Assessment
Following extensive market research (i.e., someone finally watched TRON), we have identified several concerning developments: • Microsoft: 'Azure Grid for Teams' is just SharePoint with neon themes • NVIDIA: H10000 'Derezz Edition' GPUs sold out despite being regular H100s with RGB strips
• Meta: 'Disc duels' implemented as VR dodgeball, causing 847 workplace injuries • Apple: I/O Tower Adapter is a $129 USB-C dongle that doesn't connect to anything • Google: 47 competing Grid projects, all in perpetual beta • Amazon: AWS Gridverse charges $0.0001 per 'reality manipulation request' (returns HTTP 501: Not Implemented)
Market Response:
• TRON Coin up 2,847% (it's a meme coin someone made last Tuesday) • Disney stock hits all-time high on 'accidental documentary' speculation • Jeff Bridges trending on LinkedIn as 'Original Grid Architect' • 1982 TRON Blu-rays selling for $400 on eBay as 'technical documentation'
The Intern Report:
*"I watched TRON. It's about a programmer who gets digitized and fights in computer gladiator games. There are glowing frisbees. Kevin Flynn runs an arcade. None of this is real technology. We've collectively lost our minds."*
The Final Reality Check: The Tech Media Responds
TechCrunch: "Grid Physics or Grid Panic? How Silicon Valley Fell for a 40-Year-Old Movie" – "most expensive case of collective delusion in tech history" The Verge: "We tried every 'Grid Physics' product. They're all just regular tech with neon lights." Ars Technica: "Consciousness transfer APIs violate the laws of physics" – several experts asked if this was a prank.
Hacker News: "Show HN: I implemented TRON in JavaScript" — Top comment: 'This is just Pac-Man with better graphics'
Investor Call Transcript
INVESTOR: So let me understand this correctly. You recommended we invest $2.5 billion in a company whose entire business model is based on... a movie? PRINCIPAL ANALYST: In my defense, the financial projections seemed very detailed— INVESTOR: They projected $847 billion in revenue from 'Grid access licensing!' GRID ACCESS LICENSING! That's not a thing!
PRINCIPAL ANALYST: The market validation appeared strong— INVESTOR: Because every other VC is apparently as delusional as you are! This is like the tulip bubble, except somehow dumber! INVESTOR 2: I just want to confirm - we committed capital to implement 'I/O Towers' that grant 'administrative privileges over physical reality'? PRINCIPAL ANALYST: ...yes. INVESTOR 2: And you didn't think to ask what those terms actually mean? PRINCIPAL ANALYST: They seemed self-explanatory within the Grid Physics framework— INVESTOR: THERE IS NO GRID PHYSICS FRAMEWORK! IT'S A MOVIE!
Epilogue: The Aftermath
Six months later, the 'Grid Physics' market collapsed when someone finally asked TAI's founders to demonstrate their technology live on stage. The demonstration consisted of: 1. Playing clips from TRON on a projector 2. Throwing actual frisbees at the audience
3. A PowerPoint slide that just said 'You have to believe' The only surviving product was Jensen Huang's RGB lighting business, pivoted to 'Gaming Aesthetic Solutions' and sold to Razer for $2 billion.
Final casualty count:
• $73 billion in market cap evaporated • 847 'Grid Physics' startups dissolved • One very expensive lesson about the difference between science fiction and science
The TAI founders were last seen opening a retro arcade in Portland, having apparently achieved their true vision all along.
*"In the end, the real Grid was the friends we made along the way."* – Kevin Flynn, probably
