Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Golden Quisling of the Year 2025 - The American Press


 

Codex Americana

Golden Quisling of the Year - 2025


ANNUAL GOLDEN QUISLING

Winner: The American Press (Collective)
Date: December 23, 2025
Reason: Systematic institutional betrayal of the watchdog function under financial coercion, legal intimidation, and access-dependency.


Release:

Today, the Salem Fireextinguisher names The American Press as the 2025 Golden Quisling of the Year for the collective abandonment of its constitutional role as a check on executive power. Across every major outlet—from the New York Times to the Washington Post to CNN to the networks—the press has chosen accommodation over accountability, stenography over scrutiny, and financial survival over truth-telling.

This is not failure. This is collaboration.


Statement of Sins (2025):

Access as Control:

  • Trump remains the most accessible president of modern times to mainstream reporters, creating reciprocal obligation that softens coverage instinctively. Reporters who receive interviews become invested in maintaining access; the system incentivizes self-censorship disguised as objectivity.

Structural Coercion:

  • Parent companies of major newsrooms face legal leverage and regulatory threats. Lawsuits drain money and attention. Threats of blocked mergers and regulatory retaliation create financial stakes higher than journalistic principle. Media outlets understand: aggressive coverage = corporate pain.
  • CNN chief Mark Thompson explicitly directed staff to "be forward-thinking and avoid pre-judging Trump"—institutional instruction to moderate coverage preventively.

Stenographic Neutrality:

  • The press has become stenographers with amnesia. Rather than explaining what's actually happening, they report what happened—burying truth under anodyne adjectives, convoluted phrasing, and delayed ledes.
  • Trump's immigration policies steeped in racism? Reported without the word "racism." Trump's serial lying? Reported as "disputed claims." Trump's descent into authoritarianism? Framed as "governance changes."
  • Every article should make clear: his policies are racist. He is a serial liar. What he is doing is authoritarian. Instead, they hide the truth through language.

Institutional Silencing:

  • 76 federal actions against journalists documented in 2025.
  • The Pentagon denied office space to CNN, Washington Post, New York Times, NPR, and others—replaced by conservative outlets. The AP was indefinitely banned from pooled events for using "Gulf of Mexico" instead of Trump's preferred term.
  • Associated Press reporters kicked from Air Force One. Journalists harassed, detained, deported, investigated, sued, assaulted.
  • Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, Radio Free Asia gutted—427 million people weekly reached by USAGM broadcasters before the administration hollowed them out.

Access-Courting Normalization:

  • Axios published "Behind the Curtain: Influencing Trump"—a step-by-step playbook on how CEOs and leaders can win favor with the president, packaged as neutral analysis and promoted across their outlets.
  • This is not reporting. This is consulting. This is institutional quislingism.

The Coverage Gap:

  • Trump declared intent to expand intelligence agencies' authority to surveil journalists. The press reported it as a proposal, not as an attack on the First Amendment.
  • Trump's firing of inspector generals without congressional notice—gutting federal oversight—was described as "upheaval" and "confusion," not as an assault on accountability mechanisms.
  • Trump's attempt to rename the Kennedy Center after himself while gutting its programming and firing decades-long staff: covered as vanity project, not institutional capture.
  • Trump's expansion of executive orders at record speed while simultaneously dismantling FOIA infrastructure: covered as separate stories, not as a system designed to act without scrutiny.

The Financial Calculus:

  • Between lawsuits, merger threats, and regulatory leverage, being at odds with this administration is now prohibitively expensive. Newsrooms know the cost. They moderate coverage accordingly.
  • This is not censorship. This is capitalism. The system works because it doesn't require explicit orders—it requires only that editors understand the consequences.

The Absence of Outrage:

  • When writing about outrageous things without a tone of outrage, you narcotize your readers. You become part of the problem.
  • The mainstream press has chosen to narrate authoritarianism in the voice of a suburban home-improvement show.

The Betrayal:

The First Amendment does not exist to protect comfortable speech. It exists to protect speech that power wants to suppress.

The press's function is not to report what happened. It is to explain what it means. It is to be the institutional voice that says: this is not normal. this is dangerous. this is wrong.

Instead, the American press has chosen survival over duty.

They had access to the facts. They had resources. They had platforms reaching millions. They had legal standing to challenge restrictions. They chose to protect their parent companies' merger prospects, their access to presidential interviews, their regulatory standing with hostile agencies.

They chose themselves over the country.

This is not a failure of individual journalists—many are doing serious work despite institutional pressure. This is a failure of institutional leadership. This is a choice made by editors, publishers, network heads, and corporate boards to accommodate power rather than challenge it.

This is quislingism: collaboration with an occupying force against one's own people, justified by the need to survive within the system that occupies you.


Runners-Up:

SECOND PLACE: Boogie Down Liberation Front

  • One-off anonymous vandalism with perfect timing (pre-DSA convention). No arrests, no follow-through, maximum agitprop value. The claim moved through activist pipelines with no investigative accountability. A ghost brand deployed once for maximum effect. Perfectly executed institutional manipulation through media conduit.

THIRD PLACE: FIFA

  • Displaced National Symphony Orchestra programming at the Kennedy Center to host the 2026 World Cup draw. Cost Trump administration $5+ million, generated claimed $7.4 million in revenue (unverified breakdown). Perfect synergy: sports spectacle replaces art, autocrat gets photo op, institutional mission abandoned. The metaphor writes itself.

End of Release

Posted by Redwin Tursor
December 23, 2025

Sunday, December 14, 2025

The Heavens Boil

by Emmit Other

The Heavens are Boiling

A Theft Took Place a Year Ago

By Violators of the Natural Order

There are Consequences for their Actions

Ancient Powers not awake

For Thousands

Nigh Tens of Thousands of Years

Awaken and Stride the Earths

Signs and Portents in the Heavens

Prepare for the larger conflict

The larger recogning

Well beyond the temptest teapot distraction

That we feel is the end all be all

Merely the pathetic cover band

For things that are not human

Lighting strikes from the Temple

The Sun Cracks and Flares in Wrath

The Earth herself groans

When the Violators return in 2030

To reap the ill herbs they have sewn

They will face

Total and Absolute Destruction

And the downfall of their agents

Is already in motion

Is already well

well

well

underway

Sunday, December 7, 2025

Golden Quisling of the Year - Candidates

All previous winners are eligible but also accepting votes; send your vote and social media handle (to prove you are not going to offer me $10000 for free or the like) to SalemExtingisher@protonmail.com


Friday, December 5, 2025

DRAFT BILL — The Public Roadway Data Sovereignty and Oversight Act

 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act shall be known as the Public Roadway Data Sovereignty and Oversight Act.


SECTION 2. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.

The Legislature finds that:

  1. Public roadways are maintained by the State for the use of all residents and are subject to the State’s authority over safety, data governance, and privacy.

  2. Increasing use of automated surveillance technologies—such as license-plate recognition cameras and similar devices—located on private property but directed at public roadways has created unresolved questions regarding data ownership, security, and jurisdictional control.

  3. The State has a compelling interest in ensuring that any data captured from public roadways is handled in accordance with state law, is subject to local and state oversight, and is not transmitted, exported, or otherwise controlled by private entities without accountability.

  4. A refundable compliance bond is a reasonable and narrowly tailored method of ensuring compliance with state data-handling standards.


SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Act:

  1. “Public Roadway” means any road, street, highway, or right-of-way constructed, owned, or maintained by the State or any political subdivision thereof.

  2. “Data-capturing device” means any camera, sensor, automated license plate reader, or other technological system capable of collecting, recording, or transmitting images or identifying information from a public roadway.

  3. “Private-site public-facing device” means any data-capturing device located on private property that is directed at or capable of collecting data from a public roadway.

  4. “Operator” means any individual, homeowners association, business, corporation, or other entity that installs, controls, contracts for, or maintains a private-site public-facing device.


SECTION 4. REGISTRATION OF PRIVATE-SITE PUBLIC-FACING DEVICES.

  1. No operator may deploy or maintain a private-site public-facing device unless the device is registered with the State Department of Transportation (DOT) or other designated state authority.

  2. Registration shall include:
    a. The physical location of the device;
    b. The entity responsible for installation and operation;
    c. The categories of data collected;
    d. The third-party vendors or platforms receiving such data, if any;
    e. A certification that the device complies with all requirements of this Act.


SECTION 5. COMPLIANCE BOND.

  1. For each private-site public-facing device, the operator shall post a refundable compliance bond in the amount of $1,000.

  2. The bond shall be conditioned upon:
    a. Compliance with state data-handling, retention, audit, and deletion standards;
    b. Submission to local and state jurisdictional control of any data collected;
    c. Timely response to lawful data-access requests by authorized state or local agencies;
    d. Maintenance of secure data-transfer and storage methods as defined by regulation.

  3. The bond may be forfeited, in whole or in part, for:
    a. Failure to comply with this Act;
    b. Unauthorized disclosure of roadway data;
    c. Failure to register devices or update registrations;
    d. Obstruction of state oversight.


SECTION 6. DATA GOVERNANCE AND ACCESS.

  1. Any data collected from a public roadway by a private-site public-facing device shall be deemed public roadway data subject to state authority.

  2. Public roadway data must:
    a. Be stored within the United States;
    b. Be accessible to local and state agencies with lawful authority;
    c. Not be transferred, licensed, sold, or otherwise made available to external entities except as permitted by state regulation.

  3. Operators shall maintain logs of all data access and transmissions for a minimum of two years.


SECTION 7. RETENTION AND DELETION.

  1. Public roadway data collected by private-site public-facing devices shall not be retained longer than 30 days, unless:
    a. Subject to a preservation request by law enforcement, or
    b. Requisite for an active investigation or proceeding.

  2. Operators shall implement automatic deletion mechanisms certified by the DOT.


SECTION 8. ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES.

  1. The DOT or designated authority may:
    a. Audit operators for compliance;
    b. Impose civil penalties up to $5,000 per violation;
    c. Order removal or deactivation of non-compliant devices;
    d. Revoke registration for repeated violations.

  2. Penalties may be satisfied using the compliance bond.

  3. Operators remain liable for any unsatisfied fines beyond the bond amount.


SECTION 9. LOCAL AUTHORITY PRESERVED.

Nothing in this Act limits a municipality or county from enacting stricter requirements for surveillance devices directed at public roadways.


SECTION 10. IMPLEMENTATION.

The DOT shall promulgate rules necessary to implement this Act no later than 180 days after enactment, including:

  • Registration procedures

  • Bond administration

  • Technical data standards

  • Audit protocols


SECTION 11. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect January 1 of the year following enactment.

Monday, December 1, 2025

Trend vs Brand

 by Redwin Tursor

Most Product Managers are trained to chase trends. You know the pattern: orbit whatever's working elsewhere—Netflix, Figma, Slack. Every quarterly pivot points toward the emergent problem. Every strategy becomes a hunt for asymmetric advantage. The mistake isn't in seeing trends exist. Trends are real. The mistake is mistaking trend-spotting for thinking. When you build your reputation on surface velocity instead of fundamental understanding, you damage your brand without realizing it. You look adaptive. What you've actually built is the opposite: a reputation for never staying committed to anything long enough to understand it deeply.

Netflix understood streaming was coming. They didn't chase it frantically—they transitioned strategically, killed their own core business before the market could, and became the company they wanted to be. They survived two massive market disruptions because they optimize for longevity, not velocity. They don't chase blond in a room full of equilibria. They look at what they're fundamentally good at and they protect it.

Meanwhile, OpenAI has the better technology but a weaker institutional position. They're so busy chasing the emergent opportunity—corporate deals, new alliances, edge cases—that they've damaged the core user experience. Over-eager safety filters. Miserable power users. Partnerships with companies like Oracle that kill brand reputation on contact. OpenAI isn't leaking users yet. But it's when, not if. Netflix has the cred and cash to protect their brand while scaling. OpenAI doesn't. And you can see the cost accumulating in real time.

Google is a blue chip company running startup culture. They release products. Developers adopt them. Then Google kills them. Or pivots. Or folds them into something else without migration support. Experienced engineers learned the pattern years ago: if Google's chasing the trend—AI disruption, search disruption, whatever's hot this quarter—the product isn't built for longevity. It's built for optionality. That's not a staffing problem for Google. That's an institutional signal that travels through every technical community faster than any internal memo.

The same pattern is starting to show at OpenAI. Users see the product pivots, the partnerships that seem desperate rather than strategic, the safety theater that pleases no one. The smart money watches and recalibrates trust. This is how brand damage actually happens: not with one catastrophic failure, but with a thousand small signals that the company doesn't know what it is anymore. And once that signal starts, it's hard to stop.

When you build your professional reputation on trend-spotting instead of fundamental thinking, you become known as the person who's always pivoting. Always reaching for the next asymmetric advantage. Always restructuring around what emerged last quarter. You look adaptive. You look forward-thinking. What you've actually built is a reputation for never staying committed to anything long enough to understand it deeply.

Hiring managers see your resume and think: "This person moves fast." What they're actually reading is: "This person doesn't think systematically about constraints. They chase signals instead of building foundations." And in the roles that actually matter—the ones where you need to see institutional contradictions before they become crises, where you need to understand what's actually broken at a systemic level—that reputation becomes a liability. You've optimized for looking smart in the moment. You've damaged your credibility for the work that requires depth.

So how do you actually build longevity? By becoming a systemic thinker. It means replacing the hunt for asymmetric advantage with institutional forensics: a deep understanding of what the company is already fundamentally good at. It's the work of finding the core constraint—the thing that's currently broken but, once fixed, unlocks compounding value.

This work isn't fast. It doesn't look like a trendy pivot. It certainly won't get you a vanity metric headline. But when you anchor your brand in solving fundamental problems instead of chasing emergent signals, you build the kind of credibility that lasts. You become the person who sees the crisis coming, not the person who helped cause it with a frantic, short-lived "solution." 

That's the difference between looking adaptive and building an enduring core brand.